When tensions rise between nations, democratic leaders typically face different constraints than their authoritarian counterparts. Democratic institutions require legislative approval, public debate, and electoral accountability before major military actions. Meanwhile, authoritarian leaders can more easily resort to force when facing domestic or international pressure. This contrast illustrates a profound truth: the Long Peace depends not just on global forces like nuclear deterrence or trade, but on how societies and their leaders choose to handle conflict.
While Essays 1 and 2 examined systemic forces sustaining peace, this essay explores the state-level policies and cultural changes that have transformed how societies approach conflict—changes that make war less likely and peace more durable. Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker has extensively documented these transformations in works like Enlightenment Now and The Better Angels of Our Nature.
State/National Scale: How Governments Choose Peace
Three key factors shape how nations approach conflict: democratic institutions, the end of imperial competition, and the searing memory of catastrophic wars.
Democratic Peace Theory represents a noteworthy pattern: mature democracies never fight each other. This isn't coincidence—democratic institutions create systematic barriers to war. Legislative approval requirements, judicial oversight, and electoral accountability to war-weary publics all constrain leaders' ability to launch conflicts. As Pinker notes, democracy serves as a brake on "glory-drunk leaders who would drag their countries into pointless wars."
From just two dozen democracies in 1945, over 100 exist today. While borderline cases exist—the War of 1812, Kargil War, Spanish-American War—these involved incomplete democratic maturity, reinforcing rather than undermining the core finding.
This pattern reveals something important about how democratic societies resolve disputes. When both sides share democratic values—compromise, negotiation, respect for legal processes—these norms naturally extend to international relations. Democratic leaders also face unique pressures: their publics bear the direct costs of war through taxes and casualties, while opposition parties scrutinize every military decision. Authoritarian leaders face fewer such constraints, making conflict with democracies more likely than between democracies themselves.
The end of imperialism removed a major source of great power conflict. Decolonization after 1945 eliminated flashpoints over colonial territories, redirecting national energies from external conquest toward internal development. Without empires to defend or expand, the territorial motivations that drove centuries of warfare largely disappeared.
Historical memory of catastrophic losses—over 100 million deaths in two world wars—created institutional learning that still influences policy today. Veterans who witnessed industrial-scale slaughter staffed early Cold War governments, practicing restraint even amid superpower rivalry. Yet as direct memory fades, this important safeguard weakens.
Societal/Individual Scale: Cultural Evolution Toward Peace
Cultural shifts span the death of romantic militarism, technological advances in communication, and demographic changes that favor peaceful societies.
The most dramatic transformation may be cultural: the death of romantic militarism. Before 1914, influential intellectual movements celebrated violent struggle as necessary for national vitality. Romantic militarism merged with nationalism, creating the "blood and soil" ideology—the belief that nations could achieve greatness only through conquest and territorial expansion.
German philosophers from Hegel to Nietzsche glorified war as preventing "social petrifaction," while cultural pessimists prophesied that only through "redemptive cataclysm" could heroic orders arise. This ideology helps explain why England and Germany—both Western, Christian, industrialized, affluent—chose to fight in 1914. Many Germans saw themselves as resisting what they viewed as the corrupting "creep of liberal, democratic, commercial culture."
After two world wars, this romance finally died. Human life became precious while glory, honor, and martial virtues were downgraded. Peace became the stated goal of every Western institution. As Pinker argues, this reflects humanity's capacity to overcome war just as we've overcome "pestilence, hunger, and poverty"—viewing conflict as a problem to solve rather than a noble calling.
Technological advances accelerated this shift. Real-time media coverage made war's brutality immediate and visceral, while social media connected populations across borders, fostering empathy and making state propaganda harder to maintain.
Demographic changes reinforced peaceful preferences. Aging populations grew reluctant to sacrifice young lives, while urbanization created constituencies less supportive of nationalist wars. Higher education correlates with peace preferences, while organized sports channel competitive instincts non-lethally—the Olympics replacing battlefields as stages for national glory.
Yet these civilizing trends remain stronger in developed nations. Rwanda's 1994 genocide and Yugoslavia's collapse demonstrate how developing or transitioning states can still experience mass violence. Economic stress can reverse civilizing trends even in advanced democracies, while democratic backsliding threatens peaceful norms globally.
The Choice Ahead
The human side of peace offers both hope and warning. Cultural evolution toward valuing life over glory, democratic institutions that constrain leaders, and historical memory of war's horrors have created unprecedented peaceful habits. But these achievements require active maintenance—they're not inevitable trends but conscious choices each generation must make anew.
In essay #4 of 4, I will examine the historical triggers that have repeatedly started wars between great powers—power transitions, resource competition, alliance entanglements, miscalculation, and ideological conflict—and whether our modern safeguards can prevent these ancient patterns from destroying what humanity has built.
Thank You To Our Sponsors:
Truflation: Learn about what prices are actually doing by going to https://truflation.com/. Use code BOBDEW10 to get 10% off purchases.
Foundation: Protect your Bitcoin using the latest off-line technology with easy-to-use Passport. Their next product, Passport Prime will protect all passwords off-line with even-better technology. https://foundation.xyz/
River Financial: If not cold storage for your Bitcoin, I’d highly recommend River for buying and holding- River is engineered to protect your Bitcoin over the long run. Use this link for discounts: https://river.com/signup?r=T7GGAF7G